4.7 Article

Mobilization of Unexploded Ordnance on the Seabed

期刊

TOXICS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxics10070389

关键词

UXO; burial; sediment transport; mobilization; Morrison equation; hydrodynamics

资金

  1. TenneT TSO GmbH
  2. Vattenfall Vindkraft A/S
  3. Federal Republic of Germany

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study finds that currents are unable to mobilize unexploded ordnance devices in almost all regions of the North Sea, while certain objects can be mobilized by waves in very shallow and extreme conditions.
Unexploded ordnance devices (UXO) pose a potential threat to human life and material during offshore construction activities. Extensive survey activities are conducted to locate, identify, and clear these objects as necessary. For the period thereafter, it is necessary to investigate whether areas that have already been cleared, or even objects that remain in place, may be affected by mobilization under tidal currents or waves, and could thus have an impact on operation and maintenance during the lifetime of the offshore installation. In this study, model simulations based on fluid mechanics are described to derive the loads on the objects caused by currents and waves and combined with knowledge of the known burial condition of the objects. Within the model, the hydrodynamic and hydrostatic loads on the object caused by waves and currents are balanced with inertia and rolling resistance. Thus, the critical current velocity and critical wave conditions for the mobilization of different objects are calculated and compared with the environmental conditions prevailing in the North Sea. As a result, a recurrence interval for the potential mobilization of objects on the seafloor is given, which can now be used to optimize route surveys and thus help accelerate offshore construction work. It is shown that currents are not able to mobilize the objects investigated in the study in almost all regions of the North Sea. Waves can mobilize certain objects in very shallow and extreme conditions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据