4.6 Article

Caterpillar-Inspired Insect-Scale Climbing Robot Using Dry Adhesives

期刊

IEEE ROBOTICS AND AUTOMATION LETTERS
卷 7, 期 3, 页码 7628-7635

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/LRA.2022.3183897

关键词

Climbing robots; insect-scale robots; piezoelectric actuators; surface-to-surface transition

类别

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19H02110]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents an insect-scale wheeled climbing robot that utilizes low-cost dry adhesive technology to meet important requirements such as surface-to-surface transitions, vertical and inverted locomotion, and high payload capacity. The robot achieves high torque-to-weight ratio with two micro-geared ultrasonic motors, allowing for vertical and inverted locomotion while carrying a high payload capacity.
Surface-to-surface transitions, vertical and inverted locomotion, and high payload capacity are important requirements for a climbing robot. Despite many previous approaches, the miniaturization of climbing robots that satisfy these requirements is still a big challenge. In this letter, we present an insect-scale wheeled climbing robot that employs a low-cost dry adhesive technology. The design, inspired by caterpillars, consists of 2 main links that are connected by a pivot joint. The prototype robot measures a length of 40 mm and a width of 10 mm, and it weighs 1.7 g. On a horizontal surface, the robot moves with a speed of 12.3 mm/s and can drag a load weight of 10 g (six times its weight) at a speed of 4 mm/s. The high torque-to-weight ratio achieved by two micro-geared ultrasonic motors permits vertical and inverted locomotion while carrying a high payload capacity (120% of the robot's weight). The locomotion strategy for surface-to-surface transitions, i.e., movements at right angle corners, is substantiated by the functionality of the pivot joint. To satisfy the design requirements, many dry adhesive tapes are evaluated, and the climbing robot with an appropriate adhesion force is demonstrated.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据