4.6 Article

Interplay of Nrf2 and BACH1 in inducing ferroportin expression and enhancing resistance of human macrophages towards ferroptosis

期刊

CELL DEATH DISCOVERY
卷 8, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41420-022-01117-y

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG SPP Ferroptose) [BR999/26-1, FU1309/2-1]
  2. Projekt DEAL

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Compared to cancer cells, macrophages have a resistance to iron-dependent cell death known as ferroptosis. This study reveals that the induction of ferroportin, an iron transporter, is a protective mechanism in macrophages against ferroptosis, and its expression is regulated by the transcription factors Nrf2 and BACH1.
Compared to cancer cells, macrophages are inert to lipid peroxidation-triggered, iron-dependent cell death known as ferroptosis. Mechanisms underlying macrophage resistance towards ferroptosis are largely obscure. Here, we show that human primary macrophages respond to RSL3, a ferroptosis-inducing inhibitor of glutathione peroxidase 4, by upregulating mRNA expression of the iron transporter ferroportin. RSL3 induces lipid peroxidation, and both, lipid peroxidation as well as ferroportin induction were attenuated by liproxstatin-1, an inhibitor of lipid peroxidation and ferroptosis blocker. At the same time, system x(c)(-) inhibitor erastin fails to elicit lipid peroxidation or ferroportin expression. Ferroportin induction in response to RSL3 demands nuclear accumulation of the redox-sensitive transcription factor Nrf2 and downregulation of the transcriptional repressor BACH1. Silencing ferroportin or Nrf2 increases the cellular labile iron pool and lipid peroxidation, thereby sensitizing cells towards ferroptosis following RSL3 treatments. In contrast, silencing BACH1 decreases the labile iron pool and lipid peroxidation, enhancing macrophage resistance towards ferroptosis. Our findings reveal Nrf2, BACH1, and ferroportin as important regulators, protecting human macrophages against ferroptosis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据