4.7 Article

Neuronal Bmal1 regulates retinal angiogenesis and neovascularization in mice

期刊

COMMUNICATIONS BIOLOGY
卷 5, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03774-2

关键词

-

资金

  1. U.S. National Institutes of Health/National Eye Institute [EY027077-01, RPB1503]
  2. National Eye Institute [P30-EY025585]
  3. Research to Prevent Blindness

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Research has shown that clock genes are expressed in the mouse embryonic retina, and this expression requires light cues. Deletion of Bmal1 and Per2 from retinal neurons leads to retinal angiogenic defects, indicating that a dysregulated circadian clock primarily drives neovascularization.
Circadian clocks in the mammalian retina regulate a diverse range of retinal functions that allow the retina to adapt to the light-dark cycle. Emerging evidence suggests a link between the circadian clock and retinopathies though the causality has not been established. Here we report that clock genes are expressed in the mouse embryonic retina, and the embryonic retina requires light cues to maintain robust circadian expression of the core clock gene, Bmal1. Deletion of Bmal1 and Per2 from the retinal neurons results in retinal angiogenic defects similar to when animals are maintained under constant light conditions. Using two different models to assess pathological neovascularization, we show that neuronal Bmal1 deletion reduces neovascularization with reduced vascular leakage, suggesting that a dysregulated circadian clock primarily drives neovascularization. Chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing analysis suggests that semaphorin signaling is the dominant pathway regulated by Bmal1. Our data indicate that therapeutic silencing of the retinal clock could be a common approach for the treatment of certain retinopathies like diabetic retinopathy and retinopathy of prematurity. Silencing of the retinal clock through targeting neuronal Bmal1 could constitute an approach to treating some forms of retinopathy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据