4.6 Review

Strategies and Tools for Supporting the Appropriateness of Drug Use in Older People

期刊

PHARMACEUTICALS
卷 15, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ph15080977

关键词

older adults; appropriateness; medication adherence; digital health; adverse drug reactions; polypharmacy

资金

  1. Italian Ministry of University and Research

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article provides an updated description of strategies and tools to improve appropriateness of drug use in older adults by reviewing published literature. The effectiveness and sustainability of each strategy and tool largely depend on local and heterogeneous experiences, resulting in contrasting results. Three main steps, prescription, patient acceptance, and continuous monitoring, should be considered in improving appropriateness. The appropriateness support also depends on the specific care setting and available resources.
Through this structured review of the published literature, we aimed to provide an up-to-date description of strategies (human-related) and tools (mainly from the digital field) facilitating the appropriateness of drug use in older adults. The evidence of each strategy and tool's effectiveness and sustainability largely derives from local and heterogeneous experiences, with contrasting results. As a general framework, three main steps should be considered in implementing measures to improve appropriateness: prescription, acceptance by the patient, and continuous monitoring of adherence and risk-benefit profile. Each step needs efforts from specific actors (physicians, patients, caregivers, healthcare professionals) and dedicated supporting tools. Moreover, how to support the appropriateness also strictly depends on the particular setting of care (hospital, ambulatory or primary care, nursing home, long-term care) and available economic resources. Therefore, it is urgent assigning to each approach proposed in the literature the following characteristics: level of effectiveness, strength of evidence, setting of implementation, needed resources, and issues for its sustainability.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据