4.5 Article

Descriptive Overview of Pertussis Epidemiology Among Older Adults in Europe During 2010-2020

期刊

INFECTIOUS DISEASES AND THERAPY
卷 11, 期 5, 页码 1821-1838

出版社

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40121-022-00668-y

关键词

Acellular pertussis vaccine; Adult vaccination; Booster vaccination; Epidemiology; Europe; Laboratory diagnostics; Older adults; Pertussis

资金

  1. GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Whooping cough continues to circulate among older adults in Europe, indicating that current vaccination strategies are insufficient. The implementation of standardized pertussis surveillance programs and strengthened vaccination for older adults are necessary.
Introduction Following the introduction of pertussis vaccination during infancy, the age-related demographics of pertussis epidemiology have changed. Methods To better understand the pertussis burden (defined here as number of cases and/or incidence rate [IR]) among older adults (OA; at least 50 years of age) in Europe, we collected data on the reported number of cases and IR in this population in Denmark, England and Scotland, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden from 2010 to 2020. Additionally, we collected contextual epidemiological information on surveillance systems, case definitions, laboratory diagnostics and vaccination approaches. Results We observed large heterogeneity in the burden among OA between countries: annual IRs ranged from 0.4 (England, 2010) to 54.5 (Norway, 2011) per 100,000 population; 9% (Denmark, 2010) to 45% (England, 2017) of all reported cases occurred in OA. No clear impact of changes in contextual epidemiological information or common trends between countries could be observed, highlighting the need for standardised pertussis surveillance programmes across Europe. The epidemiological trends observed in OA were similar to those observed in 0-4-year-olds. Conclusion This analysis showed that B. pertussis continues to circulate among OA in Europe, suggesting that current vaccination strategies are insufficient to decrease the disease burden in all age groups. This may indicate that improved monitoring of pertussis in OA and booster vaccination throughout adulthood are necessary to control the total pertussis burden. Plain Language Summary Whooping cough is an infectious, vaccine-preventable disease that is primarily serious in unvaccinated infants but can also affect adults (at least 50 years old). While vaccination is well established in children, many countries do not routinely vaccinate older adults. Moreover, whooping cough infections in older adults can be difficult to identify for healthcare professionals because of the atypical and mild nature of symptoms. Consequently, the extent of whooping cough occurrence in this population is underestimated. To better understand the extent of disease occurrence, we studied whooping cough infections in Denmark, England and Scotland, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden from 2010 to 2020. Our study was based on the number of laboratory-confirmed cases reported to relevant institutions. We also assessed whether we could identify links between disease occurrence among older adults and contextual epidemiological information, such as disease monitoring systems, methods used for laboratory confirmation, vaccination schedules and vaccination coverage rates. Our study confirmed that whooping cough affects older adults and disease occurrence follows similar trends to those in 0- to 4-year-old children. Because the contextual epidemiological information differed over time and between countries, we could not establish links with disease occurrence in older adults. These data may provide further evidence to authorities that whooping cough among older adults would be better controlled and its burden more accurately estimated with a reinforced comprehensive approach around vaccination and monitoring. Because adults can also infect children who are not yet fully vaccinated, such an approach might help further control the disease in children.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据