4.7 Article

Integrated single-cell analyses decode the developmental landscape of the human fetal spine

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104679

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province, China [2021A1515111071]
  2. Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Birth Defects [2017B 020209001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study used integrated single-cell RNA sequencing and single-cell transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing analyses to investigate cellular heterogeneity and transcriptional regulatory networks during human spine development. The findings revealed that fibroblasts with stem cell characteristics can differentiate into chondrocytes and neurons may originate from neuroendocrine cells. The interaction between macrophages and neurons involving NRP2_SEMA3C and CD74_APP is crucial for spinal cord development.
The spine has essential roles in supporting body weight, and passaging the neural elements between the body and the brain. In this study, we used integrated sin-gle-cell RNA sequencing and single-cell transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing analyses to reveal the cellular heterogeneity, lineage, and transcrip-tional regulatory network of the developing human spine. We found that EPYC + HAPLN1+ fibroblasts with stem cell characteristics could differentiate into chondrocytes by highly expressing the chondrogenic markers SOX9 and MATN4. Neurons could originate from neuroendocrine cells, and MEIS2 may be an essential transcription factor that promotes spinal neural progenitor cells to selectively differentiate into neurons during early gestation. Furthermore, the interaction of NRP2_SEMA3C and CD74_APP between macrophages and neu-rons may be essential for spinal cord development. Our integrated map provides a blueprint for understanding human spine development in the early and midges-tational stages at single-cell resolution and offers a tool for investigating related diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据