4.7 Article

Strain-boosted hyperoxic graphene oxide efficiently loading and improving performances of microcystinase

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104611

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21877046, 21472061, 21976161, 21272089]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [CCNU18ZDPY02, CCNU16CG0002]
  3. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities China (111 Program) [B17019]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes an eco-friendly strategy for simultaneous removal of microcystins and harmful Microcystis blooms by using hyperoxic graphene oxides as carrier and pure microcystinase A as connecting bridge, forming a stable HGOs@MIrA composite. The results show that HGO(5) exhibits higher loading capacities and can effectively improve the application potential of MIrA in the removal of microcystins and harmful Microcystis blooms.
Harmful Microcystis blooms (HMBs) and microcystins (MCs) that are produced by Microcystis seriously threaten water ecosystems and human health. This study demonstrates an eco-friendly strategy for simultaneous removal of MCs and HMBs by adopting unique hyperoxic graphene oxides (HGOs) as carrier and pure microcystinase A (PMIrA) as connecting bridge to form stable HGOs@MIrA composite. After oxitiation, HGOs yield inherent structural strain effects for boosting the immobilization of MIrA by material characterization and density functional theory calculations. HGO(5) exhibits higher loading capacities for crude MIrA (1,559 mg.g(-1)) and pure MIrA (1,659 mg.g(-1)). Moreover, the performances of HGO(5)@MIrA composite, including the capability of removing MCs and HMBs, the ecological and human safety compared to MIrA or HGO(5) treatment alone, have been studied. These results indicate that HGO(5) can be used as a promising candidate material to effectively improve the application potential of MIrA in the simultaneous removal of MCs and HMBs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据