4.7 Article

Quantitative modeling of human liver reveals dysregulation of glycosphingolipid pathways in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

期刊

ISCIENCE
卷 25, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104949

关键词

-

资金

  1. EPOS (Elucidating Pathways of Steatohepatitis) - Horizon 2020 Framework Program of the European Union [634413]
  2. Innovative Medicines Initiative 2 Joint Undertaking [777377]
  3. European Union's
  4. EFPIA
  5. Novo Nordisk Foundation [NNF20OC0063971]
  6. Academy of Finland [333981]
  7. MRC MDU programme grant
  8. Academy of Finland (AKA) [333981, 333981] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the metabolic pathways of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and identified metabolic signatures in the liver and blood that are associated with its progression.
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly prevalent disease that is associated with multiple metabolic disturbances, yet the metabolic pathways underlying its progression are poorly understood. Here, we studied metabolic pathways of the human liver across the full histological spectrum of NAFLD. We analyzed whole liver tissue transcriptomics and serum metabolomics data ob-tained from a large, prospectively enrolled cohort of 206 histologically character-ized patients derived from the European NAFLD Registry and developed genome-scale metabolic models (GEMs) of human hepatocytes at different stages of NAFLD. We identified several metabolic signatures in the liver and blood of these patients, specifically highlighting the alteration of vitamins (A, E) and glycosphingolipids, and their link with complex glycosaminoglycans in advanced fibrosis. Furthermore, we derived GEMs and identified metabolic sig-natures of three common NAFLD-associated gene variants (PNPLA3, TM6SF2, and HSD17B13). The study demonstrates dysregulated liver metabolic pathways which may contribute to the progression of NAFLD.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据