4.7 Article

Electrochemical Behavior of Rechargeable Al-Ni Battery Systems in Concentrated [EMIm]Cl-AlCl3 Electrolyte

期刊

ACS APPLIED ENERGY MATERIALS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 6797-6804

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsaem.2c00403

关键词

Al-ion battery; Al-Ni battery; alloying reaction; failure mechanism; Al electrode protection

资金

  1. Czech Science Foundation (GACR) [20-16124J]
  2. [A2_FCHT_2022_056]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The electrochemical behavior of the Al-Ni battery system in an electrolyte composed of aluminum chloride and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride was investigated. It was found that the de/alloying process of Al on a Ni cathode can be triggered once the Ni electrode has been chlorinated. However, the dissolved nickel chloride can react with the Al electrode, causing battery failure. An interlayer composed of AI powder was inserted to protect the Al anode and significantly improve battery performance.
In this work, the electrochemical behavior of the Al-Ni battery system in electrolyte composed of aluminum chloride (AICl(3)) and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride ([EMIm]Cl) with a molar ratio of 1.3 is investigated. The results reveal that the reversible capacity, which is based on the de/alloying process of Al on a Ni cathode, can be triggered only once the Ni electrode has been chlorinated. The value of reversible capacity is related to the chlorination degree of the nickel electrode. However, because the produced nickel chloride is soluble in the [EMIm]Cl-based electrolyte, the dissolved Ni2+ can migrate to the Al anode side and spontaneously react with the Al electrode, causing the battery to fail drastically. To safeguard the Al anode, an interlayer composed of AI powder is inserted between the separators to react with the dissolved Ni ions. The upgraded Al-Ni battery system can provide significantly improved performance, with cycling stability increasing from 84 to over 580 cycles in an 8 min controlled galvanostatic charge procedure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据