4.7 Review

The Grasping Test Revisited: A Systematic Review of Functional Recovery in Rat Models of Median Nerve Injury

期刊

BIOMEDICINES
卷 10, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10081878

关键词

median nerve; grasping test; nerve repair; nerve crush; nerve transection; rat; animal; functional recovery; autograft; allograft

资金

  1. Open Access Publishing Fund of University of Tubingen

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The article provides a comprehensive review of functional recovery in the rat median nerve model. It highlights the impact of different types of nerve injuries on the onset and speed of recovery and recommends the use of additional tests in conjunction with the grasping test. Careful planning of repetitive examinations is necessary to ensure valid and reliable data.
The rat median nerve model is a well-established and frequently used model for peripheral nerve injury and repair. The grasping test is the gold-standard to evaluate functional recovery in this model. However, no comprehensive review exists to summarize the course of functional recovery in regard to the lesion type. According to PRISMA-guidelines, research was performed, including the databases PubMed and Web of Science. Groups were: (1) crush injury, (2) transection with end-to-end or with (3) end-to-side coaptation and (4) isogenic or acellular allogenic grafting. Total and respective number, as well as rat strain, type of nerve defect, length of isogenic or acellular allogenic allografts, time at first signs of motor recovery (FSR) and maximal recovery grasping strength (MRGS), were evaluated. In total, 47 articles met the inclusion criteria. Group I showed earliest signs of motor recovery. Slow recovery was observable in group III and in graft length above 25 mm. Isografts recovered faster compared to other grafts. The onset and course of recovery is heavily dependent from the type of nerve injury. The grasping test should be used complementary in addition to other volitional and non-volitional tests. Repetitive examinations should be planned carefully to optimize assessment of valid and reliable data.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据