4.7 Article

Mechanism of matrix influencing the cryogenic mechanical property of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin composite

期刊

COMPOSITES COMMUNICATIONS
卷 33, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.coco.2022.101220

关键词

Cryogenic; CFRP; Epoxy; Mechanical property

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12062016, U1837203]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFA0702802]
  3. Nanchang Hangkong University Research Startup Foundation [EA202101201, EA201801209]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study focuses on the cryogenic mechanical properties and evolution mechanism of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin composites. It is found that the resin molecular segments are frozen under cryogenic condition, leading to increased brittleness and reduced failure strain. In addition, the cryogenic environment enhances the packing density and intermolecular forces, resulting in increased strength and modulus of the composite material.
This study focuses on the cryogenic mechanical property of carbon fibre reinforced epoxy resin composite (CFRP) unidirectional laminate, and the cryogenic evolution mechanism is discussed from the microstructural perspective of resin free volume and intermolecular forces. The primary transition temperature (147 degrees C) and the secondary transition temperature (-25 degrees C) is identified through dynamic mechanical analysis. As the cryogenic condition (-196 degrees C) is significantly lower than the temperature of main-chain segmental and micro-structure unit motion, the resin molecular segments are frozen, free volume fraction and resin toughness are reduced, thus the brittleness increases. These effects reduce the cryogenic failure strain of CFRP at break by 43.7% compared to room temperature, resulting in a smoother fracture surface morphology. Resin molecules under cryogenic condition have higher packing density, stronger intermolecular forces, which increase the strength and modulus of both resin and CFRP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据