4.7 Article

Experiences of Transgender and Gender Expansive Physicians

期刊

JAMA NETWORK OPEN
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.19791

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [1K23HL155895-01A]
  2. National Institutes of Health Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's Health Scholars program at University of California-Davis [5K12HD051958-17]
  3. Academy for Women in Academic Emergency Medicine

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the biases that TGE physicians face in their profession and highlights interpersonal and structural factors that can mitigate these biases.
IMPORTANCE Although LGBTQIA+ (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority) physicians experience bias in the workplace, there is a paucity of data on the experiences of physicians who identify specifically as transgender and/or gender expansive (TGE; gender expansive is an umbrella term encompassing individuals and gender identities that may exist beyond the binary framework [eg, may include nonbinary, genderqueer, and agender individuals]). OBJECTIVES To explore the professional experiences of TGE physicians, identify barriers to inclusion, and highlight stakeholder-derived strategies that promote an inclusive workplace. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This qualitative study informed by semistructured interviews was conducted among 24 TGE physicians in the US from April 1 to December 31, 2021. The sample of TGE physicians was recruited using convenience and snowball sampling. Interviews were recorded and transcribed. Using thematic analysis, at least 2 members of the research team performed blinded coding of each transcript, in an iterative process. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Data collection and thematic analysis examining themes of physicians' experiences. RESULTS Among 24 physicians (mean [SD] age, 39 [1.4] years) interviewed, 8 (33%) self-identified as transgender women, 7 (29%) as transgender men, 4 (17%) as nonbinary, 3 (13%) as transgender and nonbinary, and 2 (8%) as genderqueer. Prominent themes of the interviews included emotional distress as a result of transphobia, dominance of a rigid binary gender paradigm, and structural and institutional factors that are associated with psychological and physical safety and feelings of isolation as a TGE physician. Clear steps of affirmation were identified that could mitigate the emotional stressors, including signs of safety, active allyship, and mentorship by other TGE physicians. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this qualitative study, TGE physicians reported facing both overt and subtle biases associated with their identity and gender presentation. Participants also noted several interpersonal and structural factors that mitigate the effect of these biases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据