4.8 Article

Scientific evidence on the political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals

期刊

NATURE SUSTAINABILITY
卷 5, 期 9, 页码 795-800

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41893-022-00909-5

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [788001, 819566]
  2. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [01LS1906A]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [819566, 788001] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study shows that the Sustainable Development Goals have primarily had a discursive influence and limited political impact on institutions and policies. The transformative effect of the goals, such as legislative action and changing resource allocation, remains rare.
The Sustainable Development Goals were launched as a worldwide governance framework, but little is known about their actual political impacts. This study shows evidence that the Sustainable Development Goals have had largely a discursive influence and only limited transformative political impact. In 2015, the United Nations agreed on 17 Sustainable Development Goals as the central normative framework for sustainable development worldwide. The effectiveness of governing by such broad global goals, however, remains uncertain, and we lack comprehensive meta-studies that assess the political impact of the goals across countries and globally. We present here condensed evidence from an analysis of over 3,000 scientific studies on the Sustainable Development Goals published between 2016 and April 2021. Our findings suggests that the goals have had some political impact on institutions and policies, from local to global governance. This impact has been largely discursive, affecting the way actors understand and communicate about sustainable development. More profound normative and institutional impact, from legislative action to changing resource allocation, remains rare. We conclude that the scientific evidence suggests only limited transformative political impact of the Sustainable Development Goals thus far.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据