4.8 Article

A High Potential Polyanion Cathode Material for Rechargeable Mg-Ion Batteries

期刊

SMALL METHODS
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/smtd.202200363

关键词

cathode materials; polyanions; rechargeable magnesium-ion batteries; structural water

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51974070, 52174276]
  2. LiaoNing Revitalization Talents Program [XLYC1907069]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [N2105001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The authors present a new polyanion cathode material, KVPCH, which exhibits high redox potential and contains structural water, enabling efficient reversible Mg2+ intercalation at high potential. This work provides effective paths for the design of cathode materials for Mg-ion batteries.
The development of Mg-ion batteries is hindered by the lack of cathode materials that allow facile and reversible Mg2+ intercalation at high potential. Herein, the authors present a polyanion cathode material of K-2(VO)(2)(HPO4)(2)(C2O4)center dot 4.5H(2)O (KVPCH) for Mg-ion batteries. The inductive effect of polyanions ensures the high redox potential of the vanadium centers. In addition, the material contains structural water located between the layers. It helps with Mg2+ desolvation at the electrode-electrolyte interface and facilitates its diffusion in the structure, as confirmed by experimental analysis and theoretical calculations. Thanks to those factors, the KVPCH electrode presents excellent Mg storage capability at room temperature. It delivers 121 mAh g(-1) capacity at 1C with a high average discharge potential of 0.16 V versus Ag/Ag+ (3.2 V vs Mg/Mg2+). A capacity retention of 87% is realized after 1500 cycles at 5C. A rocking-chair Mg-ion full cell is also demonstrated with the KVPCH cathode and a MoOx anode, which achieves 46 mAh g(-1) capacity (based on the total active material mass of two electrodes). This work would bring effective paths for the design of cathode materials for Mg-ion batteries.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据