期刊
JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE
卷 23, 期 1, 页码 165-172出版社
WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jep.12660
关键词
decision making; facilitators; implementation; knee osteoarthritis; nonadherence; qualitative research
Rationale, aims and objectivesGuidelines for patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) are suboptimally implemented in clinical care. To improve guideline adherence, patients' perceived barriers and facilitators in current care were investigated. MethodsEleven patients with knee OA were extensively interviewed using a semistructured script based on quality indicators. Directed content analysis, within the framework of Grol and Wensing, was performed to describe barriers and facilitators in 6 domains: guideline, health care professional, patient, social environment, organization, and financial context. Data were analyzed using NVIVO 10 software. ResultsIn total, 38 barriers, at all 6 domains, were identified. The most frequently mentioned barriers were in the domains of the patient and the health care professional, namely, patients' disagreement with guidelines recommendations, negative experience with drugs, patients' limited comprehension of the disease process, and poor communication by the health care professional. The patients' disagreement with recommendations is further explained by the following barriers: insistence on medical imaging, fear that physiotherapy aggravates pain, and perception that knee OA is not a priority health issue. Patients also reported 20 facilitators, all of which are listed as opposing barriers. ConclusionsPatients indicate that both personal factors and factors related to health care professionals play an important role in nonadherence. An interview script, based on quality indicators, was a significant aid to structurally formulate barriers and facilitators in the perceived knee OA care. Future guideline implementation strategies should take the identified barriers and facilitators into account.
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据