4.6 Article

Experimental Sabatier plot for predictive design of active and stable Pt-alloy oxygen reduction reaction catalysts

期刊

NATURE CATALYSIS
卷 5, 期 6, 页码 513-523

出版社

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41929-022-00797-0

关键词

-

资金

  1. Office of Naval Research [N000141812155]
  2. Department of Energy Office of Science [DE-SC0012704]
  3. National Science Foundation Materials Research Science and Engineering Center programme through the University of California Irvine Center for Complex and Active Materials [DMR-2011967]
  4. National Science Foundation [CBET-1805022, CBET-2005250]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a binary experimental descriptor to predict the activity and stability of Pt-alloy oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. By directly correlating the binary experimental descriptor with the calculated Delta E-O, an experimentally validated Sabatier plot is proposed.
A critical technological roadblock to the widespread adoption of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells is the development of highly active and durable platinum-based catalysts for accelerating the sluggish oxygen reduction reaction, which has largely relied on anecdotal discoveries so far. While the oxygen binding energy Delta E-O has been frequently used as a theoretical descriptor for predicting the activity, there is no known descriptor for predicting durability. Here we developed a binary experimental descriptor that captures both the strain and Pt transition metal coupling contributions through X-ray absorption spectroscopy and directly correlated the binary experimental descriptor with the calculated Delta E-O of the catalyst surface. This leads to an experimentally validated Sabatier plot to predict both the catalytic activity and stability for a wide range of Pt-alloy oxygen reduction reaction catalysts. Based on the binary experimental descriptor, we further designed an oxygen reduction reaction catalyst wherein high activity and stability are simultaneously achieved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据