4.0 Article

Study on the relationship among typhoon, climate change, and acute Stanford type A aortic dissection in southern of Zhejiang in China

期刊

GENERAL THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY
卷 71, 期 2, 页码 113-120

出版社

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s11748-022-01837-z

关键词

TAAD; Southern of Zhejiang Province; Typhoon; Climate change; Incidence

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the relationship between typhoon, climate change, and acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in southern Zhejiang Province, China. The findings suggest that TAAD incidence is highest in winter and lowest in summer. Maximum wind speed and water vapor pressure may serve as protective factors.
Background The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between typhoon, climate change, and acute Stanford type A aortic dissection (TAAD) in southern of Zhejiang Province in China. Method 371 patients with TAAD were admitted to three hospitals (the aortic dissection center) in southern of Zhejiang Province, China from January 2015 to December 2020, and data were retrospectively collected, the data included (1) the number of patients admitted in different months and seasons, (2) daily meteorological data in southern of Zhejiang Province, and (3) typhoon information were retrospectively analyzed. Results The number of TAAD occurred in winter was the highest and in summer was the lowest. The incidence of TAAD was correlated with minimum temperature, maximum wind speed, mean wind speed, and water vapor pressure (P < 0.05). Maximum wind speed (RR 0.37; 95% CI 0.17 to 0.80, P = 0.01) and water vapor pressure (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.92 to 1, P = 0.03) were the protective factor. The occurrence incidence of TAAD under the influence of typhoon climate was less than that during the period not affected by typhoon (P < 0.05). Conclusion There was a correlation between typhoon, climate change, and the occurrence of TAAD in southern Zhejiang Province. Wind speed, vapor pressure, and typhoon may be protective factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据