4.6 Article

Fundamental insights of mechanical polishing on polycrystalline Cu through molecular dynamics simulations

期刊

MATERIALS TODAY COMMUNICATIONS
卷 32, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103980

关键词

Nano -polishing; Molecular dynamics simulation; Polycrystalline grains; Interaction forces; Shear slip; Dislocation motions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article investigates the impact of different sizes of abrasives on the surface of polycrystalline copper during nano-polishing through a molecular dynamics simulation. The study reveals that increasing abrasive size and velocity result in an increase in interaction forces, which affect the surface finish.
Mechanical polishing is an ultra-precision class finishing process to achieve a nanoscale surface finish. During nano-polishing of any engineering materials, the material removal takes place in the form of atomic-clusters. However, quantifying the process characteristics becomes difficult from a mechanical and metallurgical point of view. To understand the mechanism of material removal on polycrystalline material during nano-polishing through abrasives, a molecular dynamics simulation has been implemented. This simulation work investigates nano-polishing on polycrystalline copper (p-Cu) with two different cases of abrasive sizes at different cutting velocities. Results were analysed for the temperature, percentage of material removal, shear slip planes, dislo-cations, and interaction forces between abrasive and p-Cu workmaterial. Increased abrasive sizes and velocities resulted in increasing interaction forces during nano-cutting until shear slip formation. The p-Cu grains adjacent to the abrasive undergoes different elastoplastic deformation due to the shear slip and sessile dislocations, which affected the surface finish. This work is helpful to utilize mechanical nano-polishing or diamond turning process parameters for efficient material removal from polycrystalline surface.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据