4.7 Article

Reference Values of M-mode Echocardiographic Parameter in Adult Toy Breed Dogs

期刊

FRONTIERS IN VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.918457

关键词

M-mode echocardiography; myxomatous mitral valve disease; mitral regurgitation; LVIDDN; toy breed dogs

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to investigate reference values for left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter corrected for body weight (LVIDDN) in toy breed dogs. The results showed that a LVIDDN value of >= 1.6 can be used as a reference for the diagnosis of stage B2 MMVD.
Introduction:Myxomatous mitral valve disease (MMVD) is one of the most common heart diseases in dogs, and there is a dearth of reports that have investigated reference values for left ventricular end-diastolic internal diameter corrected for body weight (LVIDDN) exclusively in toy breeds. AnimalsEighty-six client-owned healthy dogs weighing <5 kg, including Toy Poodles, Chihuahuas, Yorkshire Terriers, Papillon, and other small breeds or small mixed breeds (mixed breed, Pomeranian, dachshund, Shih Tzu, and Maltese). In this retrospective single-center study, data were collected from dogs attending clinic for annual checkup between April 2014 and March 2021. Materials and MethodsExperienced echocardiographers performed transthoracic echocardiography, with reference ranges established using healthy dogs. Measurements of body weight (BW), heart rate, and several echocardiographic variables were obtained. The association between BW and echocardiographic parameters was assessed by linear regression analyses. M-mode measurements were obtained and normalized using equations developed from the regression analyses. ResultsThe LVIDDN value for 95% of dogs weighing ConclusionsWe propose a reference LVIDDN value of >= 1.6 for the diagnosis of stage B2 MMVD in toy breed dogs. The results of our study will guide clinicians in deciding when to start treatment for MMVD in small breed dogs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据