4.7 Article

Shear walls optimization in a reinforced concrete framed building for seismic risk reduction*

期刊

JOURNAL OF BUILDING ENGINEERING
卷 54, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jobe.2022.104620

关键词

Reinforced concrete; Shear walls; Optimization; Risk; Seismic hazards

资金

  1. Building Research Establishment (BRE) [NE/N012240/1]
  2. Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This research presents a risk-based approach to assess the risk of buildings under seismic conditions by optimizing the layout and thickness of specified shear walls, validated on a building in Beichuan, China. The methodology, validated on a building in Beichuan, China, demonstrates a reduction in risk and additional benefits.
Seismic hazards represent a permanent threat to buildings. The paper argues that risk-oriented approaches provide an interesting solution to account for the long-term resilience of buildings, both for the design of new structures and the rehabilitation of existing ones. The proposed research draws upon the standard definition of risk as a function of vulnerability, hazard and exposure to develop an optimization-based methodology for risk appraisal of buildings in seismic conditions. The proposed methodology allows to identify the optimum layout and thickness of shear walls in a reinforced concrete frame, based on a target risk performance. This is achieved through the coupling of an evolutionary computing environment with an object-oriented structural analysis tool, involving its native Application Programming Interface (API). The latter allows to automate the search for the optimum shear wall configuration solution. The research is validated on the Beichuan Hotel building in Old Beichuan (China), heavily affected by the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake. The paper evidences that the adoption of the proposed methodology leads to a risk reduction of about 80% compared to the as-built scenario, with additional benefits from both a financial and building functionality perspective.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据