4.6 Article

Aflatoxin B1 Acts as an Effective Energy Donor to Enhance Fluorescence of Yellow Emissive Carbon Dots

期刊

ACS OMEGA
卷 7, 期 33, 页码 29297-29305

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03498

关键词

-

资金

  1. Istanbul Technical University-Scientific Research Projects Unit (ITU-BAP) [TYL-2021-43446]
  2. ITU-BAP (Istanbul Technical University-Scientific Research Projects Unit)
  3. Notes

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study enhanced the quantum yield of yellow emissive CDs using two different methods and found that aflatoxin B1 can act as an emission booster for CDs. The highly luminescent yellow emissive CDs have potential applications in sensing aflatoxin B1.
Carbon dots (CDs) are versatile fluorescent nanocrystals with unique optical and structural properties and are commonly used in biosensing, bioimaging, and biomolecule tagging studies. However, fluorescence of CDs is brightest in the wavelength range of 430-530 nm, which overlaps with the autofluorescence range of many eukaryotic cells and makes CDs impractical for in vivo and in vitro imaging studies. Thus, the design of yellow-red emissive CDs with high quantum yield is of importance. In this study, the quantum yield of traditional yellow emissive CDs was enhanced by two different methods: (1) the surface of traditional yellow emissive CDs passivated with a biomolecule, urea, through easy, rapid, inexpensive microwave assisted synthesis methods and (2) a fluorescent biomolecule, aflatoxin B1, used as an energy donor for yellow emissive CDs. In the first method, the quantum yield of the CDs was enhanced to 51%. In the second method, an efficient energy transfer (above 40%) from aflatoxin B1 to the CDs was observed. Our study showed that highly luminescent yellow emissive CDs can be synthesized by simple, rapid microwave assisted synthesis methods, and these CDs are potential candidates to sense aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, our results indicated that Aflatoxin B1 can be considered as an emission booster for CDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据