4.7 Article

α-Pinene, linalool, and 1-octanol contribute to the topical anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of frankincense by inhibiting COX-2

期刊

JOURNAL OF ETHNOPHARMACOLOGY
卷 179, 期 -, 页码 22-26

出版社

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jep.2015.12.039

关键词

Frankincense; Anti-inflammatory; Analgesic; Cyclooxygenase-2; Oil extract

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573887, 81373842]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China Hubei [2013CFB451]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ethnopharmacological relevance: Frankincense oil and water extracts (FOE, FWE) have long been used for external treatment of inflammation and pain. The present study was conducted to identify the active ingredients responsible for the anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects and to determine the underlying mechanisms. Materials and methods: The compositions of FOE and FWE were identified and compared by GC-MS. The anti-inflammatory and analgesic activities of the two extracts and their possible active ingredients (alpha-pinene, linalool, and 1-octanol) were evaluated and compared in a xylene-induced ear edema model and a formalin-inflamed hind paw model. Inflammatory infiltrates and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression in hind paw skin were investigated by histological staining. Results: The contents of alpha-pinene, linalool, and 1-octanol in FOE were much higher than those in FWE. Mice treated with FOE exhibited greater and faster lessening of swelling and pain than mice treated with FWE. The combination of the three components had more potent pharmacological effects on hind paw inflammation and COX-2 overexpression than the three components used alone. Conclusions: These findings suggest that topical application of FOE or its active ingredients (including alpha-pinene, linalool, and 1-octanol) exhibit significantly anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects through inhibiting nociceptive stimulus-induced inflammatory infiltrates and COX-2 overexpression. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据