4.7 Article

Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria Improve Growth and Fruit Quality of Cucumber under Greenhouse Conditions

期刊

PLANTS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/plants11121612

关键词

rhizobacteria; PGPR; nutraceutical quality

资金

  1. Universidad Autonoma Agraria Antonio Narro [11215.21P]
  2. Tecnologico Nacional de Mexico, Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnologia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on cucumber fruit growth and quality. The results showed that inoculation with PGPR improved various growth parameters and fruit quality, contributing to reducing costs, decreasing pollution, and achieving global food safety and security.
Cucumber fruit is rich in fiber, carbohydrates, protein, magnesium, iron, vitamin B, vitamin C, flavonoids, phenolic compounds, and antioxidants. Agrochemical-based production of cucumber has tripled yields; however, excessive synthetic fertilization has caused problems in the accumulation of salts in the soil and has increased production costs. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of three strains of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on cucumber fruit growth and quality under greenhouse conditions. The rhizobacteria Pseudomonas paralactis (KBendo6p7), Sinorhizobium meliloti (KBecto9p6), and Acinetobacter radioresistens (KBendo3p1) was adjusted to 1 x 10(8) CFU mL(-1). The results indicated that the inoculation with PGPR improved plant height, stem diameter, root length, secondary roots, biomass, fruit size, fruit diameter, and yield, as well as nutraceutical quality and antioxidant capacity, significantly increasing the response of plants inoculated with A. radioresistens and S. meliloti in comparison to the control. In sum, our findings showed the potential functions of the use of beneficial bacteria such as PGPR for crop production to reduce costs, decrease pollution, and achieve world food safety and security.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据