4.6 Review

Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Modeling and Application in Antibacterial and Antifungal Pharmacotherapy: A Narrative Review

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11080986

关键词

PK; PD modeling; antibacterial; antifungal; pharmacotherapeutic treatment

资金

  1. Coordenacao de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nivel Superior-Brasil (CAPES) [001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are related to therapeutic drug monitoring and drug development. Pharmacokinetics describes the time course of plasma concentrations after administering a drug-dose, while pharmacodynamics describes the intensity of the response to these concentrations. The integration of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling has applications in optimizing dose regimens for antibacterial and antifungal treatments.
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics are areas in pharmacology related to different themes in the pharmaceutical sciences, including therapeutic drug monitoring and different stages of drug development. Although the knowledge of these disciplines is essential, they have historically been treated separately. While pharmacokinetics was limited to describing the time course of plasma concentrations after administering a drug-dose, pharmacodynamics describes the intensity of the response to these concentrations. In the last decades, the concept of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling (PK/PD) emerged, which seeks to establish mathematical models to describe the complete time course of the dose-response relationship. The integration of these two fields has had applications in optimizing dose regimens in treating antibacterial and antifungals. The anti-infective PK/PD models predict the relationship between different dosing regimens and their pharmacological activity. The reviewed studies show that PK/PD modeling is an essential and efficient tool for a better understanding of the pharmacological activity of antibacterial and antifungal agents.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据