4.6 Article

Microbial Resistance to Carbapenems in Effluents from Gynaecological, Paediatric and Surgical Hospital Units

期刊

ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11081103

关键词

antibiotic-resistance; hospital effluents; carbapenems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The aim of this work is to identify and count antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in hospital effluents (HEs) of 2 units of the University Hospital Mohamed VI the Mother and Child Hospital (MCH) and the Ar-razi Surgical Hospital (ArzH), and to compare the two hospital units in terms of ARMs and seasonal variation.
The aim of this work is to identify and count antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in hospital effluents (HEs) of 2 units of the University Hospital Mohamed VI the Mother and Child Hospital (MCH) and the Ar-razi Surgical Hospital (ArzH), and to compare the two hospital units in terms of ARMs and seasonal variation. Each HE was sampled during 2016 and 2017. After identification of the pathogenic strains and determination of AMR, the results were reported for 24 ABs, including 3 carbapenems (CBP), and their consumption rates. The Predicted environmental concentration (PEC) rate of carbapenems in the HE of the study sites is calculated. A comparative analysis of the AMR of the isolated bacterial species was performed and related to the evolution of PEC in HEs. In the ArzH effluents:15 strains isolated, 7 are carbanepenem-resistant Enterobacteria (CRE) and are resistant to at least one of the 3 carbapenems tested. ArzH and MCH effluents respectively show some similarities: 26.87% and 28.57% of isolated bacteria are resistant to ertapenem while 43.48% and 57.14% are resistant to meropenem. However, for imipenem, the MCH effluent has a higher percentage of bacterial antibiotic resistance than ArzH. In addition, the percentage of resistance in each hospital unit effluent is mainly in relation with the increasing antibiotic consumption and predicted environmental values PEC for very antibiotic in each unit in the same period.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据