4.7 Review

Hibiscus sabdariffa in Diabetes Prevention and Treatment-Does It Work? An Evidence-Based Review

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11142134

关键词

diabetes; Hibiscus sabdariffa; extracts; hypoglycemic; antioxidant; antilipidemic; in vitro; animals; patients

资金

  1. Medical University of Silesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article discusses the therapeutic effects of roselle in diabetes and its comorbidities. With various active compounds, roselle exhibits hypoglycemic, antioxidant, hypotensive, and anti-lipidemic activities, as well as other indirect effects. It can be used as a standalone or adjunctive treatment to prevent or treat diabetes and its accompanying diseases.
Diabetes is currently a global health problem that is already reported as an epidemic. This metabolic disease, characterized by a disturbance in the carbohydrate, protein, and lipid metabolism, is often accompanied by disorders of several organs. Its treatment is expensive and often difficult to control. Therefore, it seems necessary to search for new drugs and solutions to facilitate therapy and reduce treatment costs. Herbal medicines are becoming more and more popular. Hibiscus sabdariffa (roselle) is a plant that grows wild in a tropical climate. It has been used in folk medicine for thousands of years. Thanks to the numerous active compounds, including polyphenols, polysaccharides, organic acids, or pectins, it is reported to exhibit hypoglycemic, antioxidant, hypotensive, and anti-lipidemic activities and numerous indirect effects that are related to them. The aim of this review was to update the knowledge about the therapeutic effects of roselle in diabetes and its comorbidities based on in vitro, animal, and human studies. After a careful analysis of the scientific literature, it can be stated that roselle is a promising product that can be used either on its own or as an addition to the conventional treatment regimens to prevent or treat diabetes and its accompanying diseases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据