4.7 Article

Simultaneous Mass Spectrometric Detection of Proteins of Ten Oilseed Species in Meat Products

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 14, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11142155

关键词

foreign protein; meat substitution; food adulteration; oilseeds; mass spectrometry; food fraud; food safety; marker peptides

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Food fraud, particularly the undeclared use of foreign proteins in meat products, is a concerning issue in the food industry. A new method utilizing UHPLC-MS/MS was developed to simultaneously detect proteins from ten different oilseed species in meat products. The study identified potential tryptic peptide markers for each species and successfully calibrated the method using emulsion-type sausages with various protein additions.
Food fraud is a common issue in the modern food industry. The undeclared use of foreign proteins in meat products is a major concern in this context. Oilseeds are ideal for this purpose due to their high protein content and since huge amounts of oil meal are obtained as a by-product of oil production. Therefore, a UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed for the simultaneous detection of chia, coconut, flaxseed, hemp, peanut, pumpkin, rapeseed, sesame, soy, and sunflower proteins in meat products. Potential tryptic peptide markers were identified by high-resolution mass spectrometry. The final twenty peptide markers selected, which are specific for one of the ten species targeted, were each measured by multiple reaction monitoring. To the best of our knowledge, twelve new heat-stable marker peptides for chia, coconut, flaxseed, pumpkin, rapeseed, sesame and sunflower have not been reported previously. Emulsion-type sausages with 0.01, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00% protein addition by each oilseed species were produced for matrix calibration. No false-positive results were recorded. In the quantification of the ten oilseed species, 466 of 480 measuring data points of the recovery rate in unknown sausages (0.15 and 0.85% protein addition by each oilseed species) were in the accepted range of 80-120%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据