4.7 Article

Exploratory Study for Probiotic Enrichment of a Sea Fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.) Preserve in Brine

期刊

FOODS
卷 11, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/foods11152219

关键词

rock samphire; Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IMC 509; SYNBIO (R); artificially acidified preserve

资金

  1. Marche Region under the PSR2014-2020 Programme Misura 16.1-Sostegno per la costituzione e la gestione dei gruppi operativi del PEI in materia di produttivita e sostenibilita dell'agricoltura Azione 2-Fase di gestione del G.O. e realizzazione del Piano di

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Considering the increasing demand for vegan and vegetarian health foods, sea fennel has been explored as a potential carrier for probiotics. During refrigerated storage, probiotic-enriched sea fennel sprouts in brine maintained high microbial loads, exceeding the recommended administration dose for beneficial health effects.
Considering the increasing consumer demand for vegan and vegetarian health foods, different vegetables have been already exploited to produce non-dairy probiotic foods. In addition to being rich in bioactive compounds, sea fennel (Crithmum maritimum L.), also known as rock samphire, represents a valuable candidate in the production of probiotic-enriched foods, and, to the authors' knowledge, it has not yet been explored as carrier for probiotics. Hence, the present study was aimed at evaluating the survival of a commercially available probiotic formulation, SYNBIO (R), and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum IMC 509 in an artificially acidified, pasteurized sea fennel preserve in brine during a refrigerated storage of 44 days. Despite slight reductions in the microbial loads, at the end of the storage, both the probiotic formulations showed loads higher than 7.0 Log CFU g(-1 )of sea fennel or mL(-1) of brine, above the recommended administration dose to exert beneficial health effects. Thus, acidified sea fennel sprouts in brine represent a potential vehicle for probiotics delivery to humans.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据