4.7 Article

Attribution of Plastic Sources Using Bayesian Inference: Application to River-Sourced Floating Plastic in the South Atlantic Ocean

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmars.2022.925437

关键词

Bayesian inference; circulation; plastic; South Atlantic; Lagrangian

资金

  1. NWO [OCENW.GROOT.2019.043]
  2. European Research Council (ERC) under European Union [715386]
  3. European Research Council (ERC) [715386] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Most marine plastic pollution originates from land, but once in the ocean, it is difficult to determine its source. Researchers have developed a Bayesian inference framework that combines information about plastic emitted by rivers with simulation techniques, allowing them to calculate the probability that a piece of plastic found at sea came from a specific river source. This framework provides the basis for attributing marine plastic pollution to its source.
Most marine plastic pollution originates on land. However, once plastic is at sea, it is difficult to determine its origin. Here we present a Bayesian inference framework to compute the probability that a piece of plastic found at sea came from a particular source. This framework combines information about plastic emitted by rivers with a Lagrangian simulation, and yields maps indicating the probability that a particle sampled somewhere in the ocean originates from a particular river source. We showcase the framework for floating river-sourced plastic released into the South Atlantic Ocean. We computed the probability as a function of the particle age at three locations, showing how probabilities vary according to the location and age. We computed the source probability of beached particles, showing that plastic found at a given latitude is most likely to come from the closest river source. This framework lays the basis for source attribution of marine plastic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据