4.6 Review

Pharmacokinetics of Dantrolene in the Plasma Exchange Treatment of Malignant Hyperthermia in a 14-Year-Old Chinese Boy: A Case Report and Literature Review

期刊

FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.918245

关键词

malignant hyperthermia; dantrolene; pharmacokinetics; plasma exchange; general anesthesia

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reports a case of a 14-year-old Chinese boy who developed malignant hyperthermia (MH) during cervical spine surgery. The researchers used dantrolene, continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH), and plasma exchange (PE) therapy, and studied the pharmacokinetics of dantrolene during PE treatment.
Malignant hyperthermia (MH) is a rare life-threatening response that is triggered by exposure to specific anesthetics commonly used during surgical interventions. Dantrolene is a well-known drug used as the first-line therapy for MH. A 14-year-old Chinese boy with a mutation in type 1 Ryanodine receptor (RyR1) whose muscle biopsy diagnosis was central core disease (CCD) had an occurrence of MH after a cervical spine surgery, during which he was placed under general anesthesia without volatile anesthetics or succinylcholine. The MH crisis treatment workflow was started and intravenous dantrolene was used, which was soon combined with sequent continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (CVVH) and plasma exchange (PE) therapy. We explored the pharmacokinetic profile of dantrolene during PE treatment. It showed that a one-compartment model with first-order kinetics was sufficient to characterize dantrolene pharmacokinetics (PK). The renal clearance estimate for dantrolene was 0.33 mL/(min*kg) and the volume of distribution was 0.51 L/kg. Though a 4-h PE elevated about 27% off-clearance for dantrolene, it eliminated extra dantrolene by a mere 4% of the area under the curve (AUC). We made no recommendation with respect to adjusting dantrolene dosing for MH adolescents with a 4-h PE.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据