4.6 Review

The Endocannabinoid System: A Potential Therapeutic Target for Coagulopathies

期刊

METABOLITES
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/metabo12060541

关键词

cannabinoids; endocannabinoids; endocannabinoid system; marijuana; cannabis; coagulopathy; blood coagulation; thrombosis; hemorrhage

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Abnormal blood coagulation is a common manifestation of many pathological conditions, and cannabinoids may modulate blood coagulation through the endogenous cannabinoid system. However, there is controversial evidence regarding the effects of cannabinoids on blood coagulation. Understanding the interaction between the coagulation system and the endogenous cannabinoid system is crucial for developing therapeutics for coagulopathies.
Abnormal blood coagulation or coagulopathy is a common manifestation of many pathological conditions. It occurs when there is an imbalance between the activities of the coagulation system and the fibrinolytic system, leading to excessive or impaired intravascular blood clot formation, which can disturb blood flow causing ischemia or hemorrhage in the affected tissues. A growing body of evidence has demonstrated blood coagulation abnormalities in association with cannabinoid use, suggesting the involvement of the endogenous cannabinoid system (ECS) in modulating blood coagulation. However, the evidence in the literature has been controversial on whether cannabinoids promote or inhibit blood coagulation. The ECS has been extensively studied in recent years for its potential as a therapeutic target for many diseases. This review provides a brief introduction to the ECS and discusses the reported anticoagulatory and procoagulatory effects of various cannabinoids, highlighting some possible mechanisms that might underlie the observed effects. Understanding the coagulatory effects of cannabinoids and the interaction between the coagulation system and the ECS is vital for developing novel therapeutics for coagulopathies.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据