4.5 Article

Aeromonas dhakensis: Clinical Isolates with High Carbapenem Resistance

期刊

PATHOGENS
卷 11, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/pathogens11080833

关键词

Aeromonas dhakensis; carbapenem; CLSI; EUCAST; MicroScan

资金

  1. University Malaya
  2. Singapore Food Agency

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examined the antimicrobial susceptibility of Aeromonas dhakensis isolates and found a high level of resistance to carbapenems. Clinical isolates showed a significant association with resistance to doripenem, imipenem, and meropenem compared to non-clinical isolates.
Aeromonas dhakensis is ubiquitous in aquatic habitats and can cause life-threatening septicaemia in humans. However, limited data are available on their antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) profiles. Hence, we aimed to examine their AST patterns using clinical (n = 94) and non-clinical (n = 23) isolates with dehydrated MicroScan microdilution. Carbapenem resistant isolates were further screened for genes related to carbapenem resistance using molecular assay. The isolates exhibited resistance to imipenem (76.9%), doripenem (62.4%), meropenem (41.9%), trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole (11.1%), cefotaxime (8.5%), ceftazidime (6%), cefepime (1.7%) and aztreonam (0.9%), whereas all isolates were susceptible to amikacin. Clinical isolates showed significant association with resistance to doripenem, imipenem and meropenem compared to non-clinical isolates. These bla(cphA) were detected in clinical isolates with resistance phenotypes: doripenem (67.2%, 45/67), imipenem (65.9%, 54/82) and meropenem (65.2%, 30/46). Our findings showed that the MicroScan microdilution method is suitable for the detection of carbapenem resistance in both clinical (48.9-87.2%) and non-clinical (4.3-13.0%) isolates. This study revealed that A. dhakensis isolates had relatively high carbapenem resistance, which may lead to potential treatment failure. Continued monitoring of aquatic sources with a larger sample size should be carried out to provide further insights.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据