4.7 Article

State of health estimation based on modified Gaussian process regression for lithium-ion batteries

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY STORAGE
卷 51, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.est.2022.104512

关键词

Lithium-ion battery; State of health; Health indicator; Data-driven; Gaussian processes regression

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study proposes a data-driven method for state of health estimation of lithium-ion batteries. The method utilizes Gaussian process regression models based on the analysis of aging characteristics and extraction of health indicators from battery charging and discharging curves. The experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves satisfactory estimation results in terms of accuracy, generalization ability, and robustness.
State of health (SOH) estimation of lithium-ion batteries is a challenging and crucial task for consumer electronics, electric vehicles, and micro-rids. This study presents a data-driven battery SOH estimation method based on a novel integrated Gaussian process regression (GPR) model. First, the aging characteristics of batteries are analyzed from multiple perspectives, and three health indicators (HIs) are extracted from battery charging and discharging curves. Then, the Pearson correlation analysis method is used to quantitatively analyze the correlation between the selected HIs and SOH. Next, a novel compound kernel function is proposed for battery SOH estimation, and different pairs of mean function and kernel function chosen from four mean functions and sixteen kernel functions are used to construct GPR models, and their estimation accuracy is compared subsequently. Finally, four different batteries with various initial health conditions from the NASA battery dataset are used to verify the performance of the proposed method. Experiments show that the method proposed in this paper has satisfactory estimation results in terms of accuracy, generalization ability, and robustness. Specifically, its estimated mean-absolute-error (MAE) and root-mean-square-error (RMSE) is only 1.7%, and 2.41%, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据