4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

An extended Kalman filter based SOC estimation method for Li-ion battery

期刊

ENERGY REPORTS
卷 8, 期 -, 页码 81-87

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.02.116

关键词

Li-ion battery; State of charge; Estimation; Extended Kalman filtering algorithm

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Accurate estimation of SOC is crucial for the safe operation of Li-ion batteries. This paper proposes a method combining Thevenin equivalent circuit model and extended Kalman filtering algorithm, which achieves better performance and higher accuracy in Gaussian noise environments.
In recent years, the global environmental pollution and energy crisis are becoming more and more serious. The Li-ion battery is widely used in vehicles due to long cycle life and high energy density. The state of charge (SOC) of Li-ion battery is an important indicator. The accurate estimation of SOC can ensure the safe operation of Li-ion battery. However, the traditional estimation method, the ampere-hour integration method, has a cumulative error and cannot maintain good results for a long time in an operating environment with the Gaussian noise. To this end, this paper firstly applies Thevenin equivalent circuit model of a battery to establish estimation model, and it can reflect the working state of the battery. Then, the extended Kalman filtering algorithm is employed to solve the estimation error caused by Gaussian noise. Finally, the test system is built in MATALAB/Simulink to investigate the performance of the proposed method. Simulation results show that the proposed method achieves better performance, and it has higher estimation accuracy in comparison with traditional methods under different working conditions. (c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Peer-review under responsibility of the scientific committee of the The 2nd International Conference on Power Engineering, ICPE, 2021.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据