4.6 Article

Targeted Analysis of the Gut Microbiome for Diagnosis, Prognosis and Treatment Individualization in Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease

期刊

MICROORGANISMS
卷 10, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10071273

关键词

IBD; microbiota; pediatric; prognosis; biologic therapy; biomarker

资金

  1. Akershus University Hospital [261980]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the fecal microbiota in pediatric patients with treatment-naive IBD and found that the abundance and species of bacteria differed between IBD patients and healthy children. Based on the abundance of bacterial species, diagnostic, phenotype, and prognostic indexes were constructed, which can aid in diagnosing and treating IBD.
We explored the fecal microbiota in pediatric patients <18 years of age with treatment-naive IBD (80 Crohn's disease (CD), 27 ulcerative colitis (UC)), in 50 non-IBD patients with gastrointestinal symptoms without inflammation and in 75 healthy children. Using a targeted qPCR approach, the quantities of more than 100 different bacterial species were measured. Results: The bacterial abundance was statistically significantly reduced in the IBD and non-IBD patients compared to the healthy children for several beneficial species. The CD patients had a lower abundance of Bifidobacterium species compared to the UC patients, and the IBD patients in need of biologic therapy had a lower abundance of butyrate producing bacteria. Based on the abundance of bacterial species at diagnosis, we constructed Diagnostic, Phenotype and Prognostic Indexes. Patients with a high Diagnostic Index had 2.5 times higher odds for having IBD than those with a lower index. The CD patients had a higher Phenotype Index than the UC patients. Patients with a high Prognostic Index had 2.1 higher odds for needing biologic therapy compared to those with a lower index. Conclusions: The fecal abundance of bacterial species can aid in diagnosing IBD, in distinguishing CD from UC and in identifying children with IBD in need of biologic therapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据