4.7 Review

Opioids and Vitamin C: Known Interactions and Potential for Redox-Signaling Crosstalk

期刊

ANTIOXIDANTS
卷 11, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071267

关键词

vitamin C; opioids; mu opioid receptor; oxidative stress; signaling; metabolism; crosstalk

资金

  1. Defense Threat Reduction Agency [HDTRA120-1-0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Opioids are widely used but have side effects such as central respiratory depression. Vitamin C has been shown to reduce these effects, but the underlying mechanisms are unclear. This review provides a signaling framework for the interaction between MOR activation and vitamin C, indicating the need for further research on their crosstalk in alleviating the negative side effects of opioids.
Opioids are among the most widely used classes of pharmacologically active compounds both clinically and recreationally. Beyond their analgesic efficacy via mu opioid receptor (MOR) agonism, a prominent side effect is central respiratory depression, leading to systemic hypoxia and free radical generation. Vitamin C (ascorbic acid; AA) is an essential antioxidant vitamin and is involved in the recycling of redox cofactors associated with inflammation. While AA has been shown to reduce some of the negative side effects of opioids, the underlying mechanisms have not been explored. The present review seeks to provide a signaling framework under which MOR activation and AA may interact. AA can directly quench reactive oxygen and nitrogen species induced by opioids, yet this activity alone does not sufficiently describe observations. Downstream of MOR activation, confounding effects from AA with STAT3, HIF1 alpha, and NF-kappa B have the potential to block production of antioxidant proteins such as nitric oxide synthase and superoxide dismutase. Further mechanistic research is necessary to understand the underlying signaling crosstalk of MOR activation and AA in the amelioration of the negative, potentially fatal side effects of opioids.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据