4.7 Article

Non-Equilibrium Protein Folding and Activation by ATP-Driven Chaperones

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12060832

关键词

chaperones; Hsp70; Hsp90; non-equilibrium; protein folding

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Recent experimental studies have shown that ATP-driven molecular chaperones can stabilize protein substrates in their native structures out of thermal equilibrium. This article proposes a unifying principle based on available evidence, which explains the conversion of chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis to the conformational free energy associated with protein folding and activation.
Recent experimental studies suggest that ATP-driven molecular chaperones can stabilize protein substrates in their native structures out of thermal equilibrium. The mechanism of such non-equilibrium protein folding is an open question. Based on available structural and biochemical evidence, I propose here a unifying principle that underlies the conversion of chemical energy from ATP hydrolysis to the conformational free energy associated with protein folding and activation. I demonstrate that non-equilibrium folding requires the chaperones to break at least one of four symmetry conditions. The Hsp70 and Hsp90 chaperones each break a different subset of these symmetries and thus they use different mechanisms for non-equilibrium protein folding. I derive an upper bound on the non-equilibrium elevation of the native concentration, which implies that non-equilibrium folding only occurs in slow-folding proteins that adopt an unstable intermediate conformation in binding to ATP-driven chaperones. Contrary to the long-held view of Anfinsen's hypothesis that proteins fold to their conformational free energy minima, my results predict that some proteins may fold into thermodynamically unstable native structures with the assistance of ATP-driven chaperones, and that the native structures of some chaperone-dependent proteins may be shaped by their chaperone-mediated folding pathways.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据