4.7 Article

Production of Fungal Quinones: Problems and Prospects

期刊

BIOMOLECULES
卷 12, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/biom12081041

关键词

HPLC; mass spectrometry; quinone; toluquinone; terreic acid; anthraquinone; anthraquinone dimer; Penicillium; Aspergillus; Talaromyces

资金

  1. Novo Nordic Foundation [NNF 18OC0034952]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Fungal quinones have diverse applications, but the feasibility of a production system must be considered, including quinone yield, purity, extraction ease, and mycotoxin co-production. This study screened filamentous fungi for quinone production and evaluated their potential for optimization.
Fungal quinones can be used for a variety of applications, such as pharmaceuticals, food colorants, textile dyes, and battery electrolytes. However, when producing quinones by fungal cultivation, many considerations arise regarding the feasibility of a production system, such as the quinone yield, purity, ease of extraction, and the co-production of mycotoxins. In this work, we display the initial screening of filamentous fungi for quinone production and evaluate their potential for future optimization. We investigated toluquinone (TQ) potentially produced by Penicillium cf. griseofulvum, terreic acid (TA) produced by Aspergillus parvulus and A. christenseniae, and anthraquinone (AQ) monomers and dimers produced by Talaromyces islandicus. The strains grew on various agar and/or liquid media and were analyzed by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-diode array detection-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-DAD-QTOF MS). In the case of AQs, feature-based molecular networking (FBMN) was used for the identification of AQ analogs. TQ was not observed in the production strains. TA constituted one of the major chromatogram peaks and was secreted into the growth medium by A. parvulus. The AQs constituted many major chromatogram peaks in the mycelium extracts and endocrocin and citreorosein were observed extracellularly in small amounts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据