4.1 Article

Comparative Exploration of the β-endorphin, Adrenocorticotrophic Hormone, and Cortisol Patterns' Response to Simulated and Conventional Transportations of Stallions (Equus caballus)

期刊

JOURNAL OF EQUINE VETERINARY SCIENCE
卷 44, 期 -, 页码 74-81

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jevs.2016.05.020

关键词

beta-endorphin; ACTH; Cortisol; Stallion; Simulated and conventional transportation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The present investigation was focalized to explore the circulating beta-endorphin, adrenocorticotrophic hormone, and cortisol patterns as tool to compare the effects of simulated transportation (ST) and conventional transportation (Cr) of 18 healthy Sanfratellano stallions accustomed to this procedure. Three different time points of duration (1, 2, and 3 hours) during STs were compared to three different time points of distance (50, 150, and 250 km) during CTs. Blood samples were taken 1 week before the experimental treatment, at rest in baseline conditions; at the first, the second, and the third week during STs, before loading, and after 1, 2, and 3 hours of duration, immediately after unloading; at the fourth, the fifth, and the sixth week during CTs, before loading, and after 50, 150, and 250 km, immediately after unloading. Compared to three different time points of distance (50, 150, and 250 km) of CI's, results showed lower beta-endorphin concentrations after 1 hour (P < .001), 2 hours (P < .01), and 3 hours (P < .05) and lower cortisol concentrations after 1 hour, 2 hours, and 3 hours (P < .0001) after STs. Compared to before values, beta-endorphin concentrations showed higher values after 2 hours (P < .001) of ST. The present research suggests that arousal levels of the two experimental treatments were different and that the highest circulating beta-endorphin and cortisol values represented different moments of the active coping process in promoting the arousal levels and stress response. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据