4.7 Article

On the Interaction Between SMARCAL1 and BRG1

期刊

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.870815

关键词

SMARCAL1-BRG1 interaction; SMARCAL1; BRG1; protein-protein interaction; SIOD; CSS4

资金

  1. Council of Scientific and Industrial Research [37 (1696)/17/EMR-II]
  2. Department of Biotechnology [BRB/PR10355/BRB/10/1342/2014]
  3. UPE-II
  4. DST-PURSE [PAC-JNU-DST-PURSE-462]
  5. UGC non-net fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

SMARCAL1 and BRG1, two ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins, interact with each other and their interaction is dependent on their ATPase activity. Mutations associated with SIOD and CSS4 prevent their interaction.
SMARCAL1 and BRG1, both classified as ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling proteins, play a role in double-strand break DNA damage response pathways. Mutations in SMARCAL1 cause Schimke Immuno-osseous Dysplasia (SIOD) while mutations in BRG1 are associated with Coffin-Siris Syndrome (CSS4). In HeLa cells, SMARCAL1 and BRG1 co-regulate the expression of ATM, ATR, and RNAi genes on doxorubicin-induced DNA damage. Both the proteins are found to be simultaneously present on the promoter of these genes. Based on these results we hypothesized that SMARCAL1 and BRG1 interact with each other forming a complex. In this paper, we validate our hypothesis and show that SMARCAL1 and BRG1 do indeed interact with each other both in the absence and presence of doxorubicin. The formation of these complexes is dependent on the ATPase activity of both SMARCAL1 and BRG1. Using deletion constructs, we show that the HARP domains of SMARCAL1 mediate interaction with BRG1 while multiple domains of BRG1 are probably important for binding to SMARCAL1. We also show that SIOD-associated mutants fail to form a complex with BRG1. Similarly, CSS4-associated mutants of BRG1 fail to interact with SMARCAL1, thus, possibly contributing to the failure of the DNA damage response pathway and pathophysiology associated with SIOD and CSS4.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据