4.8 Article

Solute-induced near-isotropic performance of laser powder bed fusion manufactured pure titanium

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102907

关键词

Titanium; Solid solution; Isotropic; Tensile properties; Laser-based powder bed fusion

资金

  1. Council for Science, Tech-nology and Innovation (CSTI) [AF-2019211-B2]
  2. Council for Science, Technology and Innovation (CSTI)
  3. Amada Foundation [AF-2019211-B2]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study explored the ability of nitrogen to reduce the degree of anisotropy in laser-based powder bed fusion (L-PBF) fabricated Ti materials. It was found that low nitrogen content resulted in anisotropic tensile properties, while high nitrogen content significantly reduced anisotropy and improved strength and ductility.
Materials produced by laser-based powder bed fusion process (L-PBF) undergo rapid solidification and several cycles of remelting. The resulting unique microstructure imparts anisotropy to the material and leads to its nonuniform deformation under load that can cause limitations in some applications. In this study, we explored the ability of nitrogen (solute) to reduce the degree of anisotropy of L-PBF fabricated Ti materials. The correlation among microstructural changes, texture evolution, and deformation behavior was investigated. L-PBF fabricated Ti with low N content (0.01 wt%) exhibits mainly continuous epitaxial growth of alpha grains with a strong crystallographic texture, leading to anisotropic tensile properties. A high N content (0.31 wt%) significantly changes the structure and texture of L-PBF fabricated Ti through the introduction of refined martensite grains with random crystallographic orientations, which reduces the degree of anisotropy and enhances strength (1066 MPa) and ductility (25%). This study will facilitate the manufacture of Ti with superior near-isotropic tensile properties, which has not been realized through traditional manufacturing processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据