4.8 Article

Numerical studies of melt pool and gas bubble dynamics in laser powder bed fusion process

期刊

ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
卷 56, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.addma.2022.102913

关键词

Melt pool flow; Bubbles motion; Pore defect; Laser powder bed fusion

资金

  1. Australian Research Council Industrial Transformation Research Hubs Scheme [IH140100035]
  2. Australian Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Through modeling, this study explored the relationship between pore formation and the dynamics of melt pool and gas bubbles in the laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) process. The results showed that the molten liquid near the gas-liquid interface flows centrifugally, generating clockwise and anticlockwise vortices. Gas bubbles originating from the powder bed voids follow the melt pool flow and can either escape or remain as pores in the solidified part.
The formation of pores can severely deteriorate the quality of parts fabricated by laser powder bed fusion (LPBF) technology. However, how the pores formation relates to melt pool and gas bubble dynamics is still not well understood. Here, through the modeling of the metal powder melting and the subsequent solidification under the conduction mode, it was found that the molten liquid near the gas-liquid interface flows centrifugally and vortices including a clockwise and an anticlockwise vortex are produced. The anticlockwise vortex dominates the molten liquid when laser turns off. The motion of gas bubbles originating from the powder bed voids follows the melt pool flow synchronously, where bubbles can coalesce, and some escape from the top and sides of the melt pool, and some remain as pores in the solidified part. For the positive value of surface tension gradient, the centripetal Marangoni convection drives the melt pool to flow in the dual clockwise circulation and obstructs the escaping orbit of bubbles, leading to higher porosity and surface humping. The present study enhances the further understanding of multi-physics in LPBF process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据