4.4 Article

Integrity Testing of a Platform-Pile System Using a Sensor Array and Wavenumber Domain Analysis

期刊

ADVANCES IN CIVIL ENGINEERING
卷 2022, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2022/7408393

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11672338]
  2. Science and Technology Program of Guangzhou, China [201904010332]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In pile integrity tests, the selection of appropriate impact and sensor locations is crucial to prevent three-dimensional effects caused by torsional and flexural modes. This study proposes a multivelocity integrity test method using a sensor array and frequency-wavenumber (FK) domain analysis to eliminate high-frequency interference and reduce errors in test results for platform-pile systems.
Appropriate impact and sensor locations must be chosen in pile integrity tests to prevent three-dimensional effects caused by the torsional and flexural modes. The three-dimensional characteristics cause high-frequency interference, especially in bridge and wharf piles. A method is required to minimize the high-frequency interference without reducing the accuracy of the pile integrity test. A multivelocity integrity test method is proposed based on a sensor array and frequency-wavenumber (FK) domain analysis to eliminate high-frequency interference and reduce the errors in the output of integrity tests of platform-pile systems. FK filtering is performed to eliminate the spatial alias frequency and separate the upward and downward wavefield and the vibration modes in an integrity test of a platform-pile system. The optimum sensor location to minimize the influence of interference signals is at the bending plane relative to the impact location. Using a sensor array reduces the influence of the sensor location on the test results and minimizes the requirements for determining the location of the excitation point and sensors in the traditional low-strain integrity testing (LST) method, thereby improving the applicability of this method.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据