4.5 Article

Comparison of activated carbon from bitter orange and Amygdalus scoparia Spach and surface modification

期刊

出版社

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s13399-022-03024-9

关键词

Activated carbon; Adsorption; Amygdalus scoparia Spach; Bitter orange; Cadmium

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, activated carbon was synthesized from bitter orange wood and Amygdalus scoparia Spach using the chemical activation method. Surface modification was conducted to enhance the efficiency of the activated carbon for metal cation removal. The results showed successful surface modification and improved adsorption properties of the activated carbon.
Activated nanocarbons are suitable adsorbents for the removal of metal cations from aqueous solutions, and surface modification is an essential technique for developing this efficiency. In this study, activated carbon was first synthesized by the chemical activation method from bitter orange wood and Amygdalus scoparia Spach, which are used as inexpensive raw materials for activated carbon synthesis. Parameters affecting synthesis include the type of chemical activator (potassium hydroxide, phosphoric acid, and nitric acid), activation time (30 to 90 min), activation temperature (400 to 600 degrees C), and initial particle size (200 to 400 microns) that optimized based on the Taguchi method. Then, the process of synthesis and surface modification of activated carbon was investigated using detection analyses. The results of FT-IR spectroscopy with elemental analysis indicated that the surface modification was successful at each stage, and the presence of epoxide, carbonyl, amino, and thiol functional groups on the activated carbon surface was confirmed. According to FESEM images, the synthesized particles were three-dimensional with an average thickness of 400-300 nm. Nitrogen uptake and desorption tests followed type I isotherms before surface modification and type II isotherms after surface modification.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据