4.6 Article

Sustainability constructs of mountain tourism development: the evaluation of stakeholders' perception using SUS-TAS

期刊

ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY
卷 25, 期 8, 页码 8299-8317

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10668-022-02401-8

关键词

Sustainable tourism; Local communities; Perception; Principal component analysis; Mountains; Yamane; s formula; SUS-TAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The success of sustainable tourism is dependent on the involvement of various stakeholders, particularly communities. This study aims to measure the attitudes of local communities towards sustainable tourism development and evaluate the reliability and validity of the SUS-TAS. The findings suggest that the SUS-TAS is a valuable tool for monitoring sustainable tourism development.
The success of sustainable tourism is inter-woven with the participation of different stakeholders in general and communities in particular. Participation becomes more important in the mountain ecosystems with a fragile resource base and limited capacities of the local people to accommodate rapid changes. The fundamental focus of this work is to measure the attitude of local communities concerning sustainable tourism development and assess the reliability and validity of the SUS-TAS. The research objective required both quantitative and qualitative research strategies. A survey of households was carried out to gather information from respondents. Yamane's formula was employed to select the sample size of respondents. Structured questionnaires were used to collect the data and SUS-TAS was applied to serve as a foundation for the analysis of local communities' attitudes to sustainable tourism development. Delineation of dimensions of SUS-TAS was done by principal component analysis with a varimax rotation. Community members exhibited their agreement to six constructs of sustainable tourism development among seven. This study validates the sustainable tourism attitude scale as one of the premier tools for monitoring sustainable tourism development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据