4.7 Article

Towards the Identification of a Suitable Commercial Diet for Carpione (Salmo carpio, Linnaeus 1758): A Multidisciplinary Study on Fish Performances, Animal Welfare and Quality Traits

期刊

ANIMALS
卷 12, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ani12151918

关键词

salmonids; aquafeeds; processed animal proteins; gut welfare; histology; fillet quality

资金

  1. Fondazione Caritro: Bando Ricerca e Sviluppo 2020 [2020.0410]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Carpione (Salmo carpio, Linnaeus 1758) is an endangered endemic fish species in Lake Garda, Italy. This study aimed to investigate the effects of different diets on the growth, health, and nutrient composition of Carpione. Four experimental diets, including a control diet based on marine ingredients and three diets with varying proportions of vegetable ingredients or processed animal proteins, were tested over a three-month feeding trial. The results showed that there were no significant differences in growth performance among the experimental groups. However, histological alterations and inflammation markers were observed in the group fed with a diet containing high proportions of vegetable ingredients. The inclusion of processed animal proteins improved gut health and nutrient uptake but also led to changes in the fatty acid composition of the fish fillets. Further research is needed to maintain the quality traits of Carpione while promoting its health and growth.
Simple Summary Carpione (Salmo carpio, Linnaeus 1758) is an endangered precious endemism of Lake Garda (Northern Italy), the largest Italian lake. To date, several bottlenecks about its culture remain unsolved, including the identification of a proper growth-out diet. In the present study, four different grossly isolipidic, isoproteic, and isoenergetic diets containing ingredients from different origins were used for S. carpio culture. Specifically, a diet largely based on marine ingredients, and currently used for carpione farming, was used as control. Three other diets were formulated in order to include relevant percentages of vegetable ingredients or processed animal proteins (at two different inclusion levels). After a three-month feeding trial, fish zootechnical performances, welfare, and flesh quality were evaluated through a multidisciplinary approach, including histology, gene expression, chemical analysis, and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). This study provided the first insights on carpione physiological responses to different commercial dietary formulations. Carpione (Salmo carpio, Linnaeus 1758) is an endangered precious endemism of Lake Garda (Northern Italy), the largest Italian lake. To date, several bottlenecks about its culture remain unsolved, including the identification of a proper growth-out diet. The aim of the present study was to test four different grossly isolipidic, isoproteic, and isoenergetic diets in which the main ingredients had a different origin. Specifically, a diet currently used by local farmers for carpione culture, largely based on marine ingredients, was used as control (CTRL), while the other three diets were formulated by partially replacing marine ingredients with plant ones (VEG) or with different percentages of processed animal proteins (PAP1 and PAP2). The feeding trial was run in triplicate, over a three-month period. No significant differences in growth performance among the experimental groups were observed. However, remarkable histological alterations and inflammatory markers upregulation were observed in VEG group, while PAP inclusion played a role in attenuating inflammation and improving nutrient uptake. Fillet analyses highlighted significant differences in marketable traits and flesh fatty acid composition among the experimental groups, including the reduction of polyunsaturated fatty acids related to PAPs inclusion. In conclusion, PAPs used in the present study promoted S. carpio gut health and absorption capacity, while further studies are required to maintain proper quality traits of the final product.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据