4.6 Article

Distributed Radar Target Detection Based on RF-SSA in Non-Gaussian Noise

期刊

ELECTRONICS
卷 11, 期 15, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/electronics11152319

关键词

radar detection; distributed target; K-distribution; STAP; sparrow search algorithm; random forest

资金

  1. 111 Project of China [B14010]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes an improved RF-SSA algorithm to balance detection efficiency and accuracy. The algorithm combines the 3DT-WD method and SSA algorithm to obtain higher detection performance through parameter optimization. Simulation experiments and real data results have demonstrated the superiority of this approach.
Distributed radar target detection in non-Gaussian noise, modeled as the sum of K-distributed clutter plus thermal noise, is considered in this paper. The conventional target techniques, e.g., constant false-alarm rate (CFAR), scatterer density-dependent generalized likelihood ratio test (SDD-GLRT), and energy integration (EI) detectors, have limited performance. On the other hand, since radar target detection can be considered a classification task, deep learning techniques have been widely applied as radar detectors in recent years, but such techniques require a larger amount of training samples to prevent overfitting, which is time-consuming. To balance detection efficiency and accuracy, this paper proposes an improved random forest algorithm based on the sparrow search algorithm (RF-SSA). First, we propose a mixed method of 3DT space-time adaptive processing and wavelet denoising (3DT-WD) to improve the output signal-to-clutter plus-noise ratio. Then, the SSA is applied to the RF algorithm to adaptively obtain the optimal parameters of the detection model. The simulation results show that the proposed RF-SSA ensures higher detection performance than the other classical methods, showing a gain of about 2 dB at the same detection probability. Moreover, the detection results of the real data further confirm the superiority of the proposed RF-SSA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据