4.6 Article

Comprehensive Pan-Cancer Analysis of TRPM8 in Tumor Metabolism and Immune Escape

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.914060

关键词

TRPM8; pan-cancer; immune cell infiltration; tumor microenvironment; DNA repair

类别

资金

  1. Guizhou Nursing Vocational College Foundation [gzhlyj2021-02]
  2. Science and Technology Foundation of Guizhou Provincial Health Committee [gzwkj2022-518]
  3. Jiangsu Province Shuangchuang Talent Plan [JSSCRC 2021533]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

TRPM8 is strongly associated with tumor physiology and immunity and has the potential to be a treatment target or biomarker for determining the prognosis of a specific type of cancer.
BackgroundTransient receptor potential melastatin 8 (TRPM8) modulates tumor biology and sensitivity to treatment. The present study aimed to determine the part it plays in tumor immunity and physiology using pan-cancer analysis. MethodData from the GTEx, CCLE, TISIDB, GSCA, cBioportal, and TCGA databases were collected using Estimate, Scanneo, and GSEA, and the associations between TRPM8 and prognosis, molecular subtypes, mutational burden, microsatellite instability, immune gene functions, and drug sensitivity were analyzed in 33 tumor types. ResultTRPM8 levels were found to be elevated in most tumors, particularly in solid tumors, with variations according to clinical stage. Mutation frequency was greatest in endometrial carcinoma. High levels of TRPM8 were linked to unfavorable prognosis, immune cell infiltration, and the tumor microenvironment, as well as correlating with abnormalities in the transcription levels of genes associated with immunity and DNA repair. TRPM8 was also linked to unfavorable patient outcomes and cancer-associated signaling. ConclusionsTRPM8 is strongly associated with tumor physiology and immunity. The Pan-Cancer analysis suggests the potential of TRPM8 as a treatment target or biomarker for determining the prognosis of a specific type of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据