4.6 Article

Post-chemotherapy pneumonia in Chinese patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: Outcomes and predictive model

期刊

FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY
卷 12, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.955535

关键词

pneumonia; diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); prognosis; ECOG score; hypoalbuminemia; chemotherapy

类别

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. [81970188]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Pneumonia is a major life-threatening complication after chemotherapy in patients with DLBCL, and risk factors include pulmonary involvement, higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score, and hypoalbuminemia. Researchers have developed a prediction model based on these factors, which can aid in the development of individualized strategies for preventing and treating post-chemotherapy pneumonia in DLBCL patients.
Pulmonary infections account for a large proportion of life-threatening adverse events that occur after chemotherapy in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); however, data on their influencing risk factors and the effects of infection are relatively limited. A total of 605 patients with DLBCL were newly diagnosed at our institution between March 2009 and April 2017, and 132 of these patients developed pneumonia after treatment (21.8%). There was a significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the pneumonia and non-pneumonia groups (hazard ratio 4.819, 95% confidence interval: 3.109-7.470, p < 0.0001), with 5-year OS of 41% and 82%, respectively. Pulmonary involvement, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score > 1, and hypoalbuminemia were identified as independent risk factors for the development of pneumonia. We constructed a prediction model based on these three factors, and the area under the curve was 0.7083, indicating good discrimination. This model may help clinicians develop individualized strategies for preventing and treating post-chemotherapy pneumonia in patients with DLBCL.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据